Mark Leibovich of The New York Times looks at what seems to be the liberal moment in the country right now.
Well, just how liberal? Thomas Frank, who hasn't made an appearance in this blog for a while, makes the following pungent remark: "A potentially liberal moment . . . assuming that liberal politicians can seize the moment and get beyond their usual plague of incompetence."
Here's Leibovich's description of what counts as a liberal resurgence:
. . . it's clear that issues once largely walled off to the liberal hinterlands have suddenly gained mainstream acceptance and urgency. "There does seem to be momentum around a set of issues that have traditionally been the property of the left," says David M. Kennedy, the Stanford University historian.
Presidential candidates, for instance, can now safely utter "universal health care" without being tarred as supporters of "socialized medicine." Polls show increasing support for raising the minimum wage, stem-cell research, gay and lesbian civil unions, alternative-energy initiatives and increased financial aid to offset the escalating cost of college.
Republicans can no longer blockade the cause of global warming to the wild-haired left. Once derided as "Ozone Man" by the former President Bush, Al Gore is now up for a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar (while California’s non-Oscar-nominated Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has been hailed as an environmental action hero for introducing stringent emissions standards).
As leftism goes, this is all fairly weak tea. But that just shows the extent to which conservatism defines the terms of political debate in the United States.